[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
GNU CC predefines two magic identifiers to hold the name of the current
function. The identifier __FUNCTION__
holds the name of the function
as it appears in the source. The identifier __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
holds the name of the function pretty printed in a language specific
fashion.
These names are always the same in a C function, but in a C++ function they may be different. For example, this program:
extern "C" { extern int printf (char *, ...); } class a { public: sub (int i) { printf ("__FUNCTION__ = %s\n", __FUNCTION__); printf ("__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = %s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); } }; int main (void) { a ax; ax.sub (0); return 0; } |
gives this output:
__FUNCTION__ = sub __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = int a::sub (int) |
The compiler automagically replaces the identifiers with a string
literal containing the appropriate name. Thus, they are neither
preprocessor macros, like __FILE__
and __LINE__
, nor
variables. This means that they catenate with other string literals, and
that they can be used to initialize char arrays. For example
char here[] = "Function " __FUNCTION__ " in " __FILE__; |
On the other hand, `#ifdef __FUNCTION__' does not have any special
meaning inside a function, since the preprocessor does not do anything
special with the identifier __FUNCTION__
.
GNU CC also supports the magic word __func__
, defined by the
ISO standard C99:
The identifier
appeared, where function-name is the name of the lexically-enclosing function. This name is the unadorned name of the function. |
By this definition, __func__
is a variable, not a string literal.
In particular, __func__
does not catenate with other string
literals.
In C++
, __FUNCTION__
and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
are
variables, declared in the same way as __func__
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |